Legal Opinion

Jablonski v. Casey

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 17, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, J.

Defendant Appellant Renate Casey, the tenant (hereinafter Casey), appeals pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A D. A., Rule 8C, from several decisions of the trial judge in a summary process action: (1) denying certain of her Requests for Rulings of Law, (2) failing to find that Plaintiff Appellee York Properties, the landlord (hereinafter York), acted in reprisal in pursuing her eviction, (3) failing to find that York breached its warranty of habitability, and (4) failing to allow Casey to reinstate her tenancy pursuant to G.L.c. 239, §8A.1

After a one day bench trial, the court issued detailed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ronan v. Donaroma's Nursery & Landscape Services, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
  2. Rosemark v. HuntMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Muni-Tech, Inc. v. HenryMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API