Legal Opinion

Runyon v. Paley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1991No. 902SC757PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Plaintiffs sued to enforce a restrictive covenant in an effort to prevent development of a tract of land by defendants. The trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm, finding that plaintiffs are not entitled to enforce the covenant in question.

The case below involves a tract of land on Ocracoke Island known as the “Gaskins lot.” That lot is bounded to the east by Pamlico Sound and to the west by a paved road now designated as State Road 1328. By deed dated 9 January 1960, Ruth Bragg Gaskins…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Raintree Corp. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Stegall v. Housing Authority of the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Lamica v. GerdesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Quadro Stations, Inc. v. GilleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Runyon v. PaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API