Legal Opinion

Quadro Stations, Inc. v. Gilley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1970No. 7021SC5PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

Defendants admit the sale and advertising of petroleum products on the lot in question but contend: (1) the restrictive covenant agreement is illegal and unenforceable as an agreement in restraint of trade such as prohibited by the statutes on monopolies and trusts, codified as Chapter 75 of the General Statutes and in particular G.S. 75-5 (b)(6); (2) the agreement cannot be enforced against defendants because they were not parties to it; (3) the description of the property covered by the agreement is so vague and indefinite as to render the agreement unenforceable and it was error for the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Jewel Box Stores Corporation v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Savon Gas Stations Number Six, Inc., and A. & H. Transportation, Inc. v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  5. Higdon v. JaffaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Quadro Stations, Inc. v. GilleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Runyon v. PaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API