Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1926No. 17236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, O.

John M. Phillips commenced his action against W. J. Walker, G. B. Lindsey, and J. D. Hie-bert, to recover on a promissory note. Tbe trial of tbe cause resulted in judgment for tbe plaintiff. G. B. Lindsey and J. D. Hie-bert have appealed tbe cause here, and submit several of tbe rulings of tbe trial court as error for reversal.

W. J. Walker was principal and G. B. Lindsey and J. D. Hiebert were accommodation indorsers. Tbe note was executed and delivered to tbe plaintiff for cattle sold and delivered by tbe latter to Walker. Tbe plaintiff took a chattel mortgage on tbe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New v. BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Schulte v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. American Investment Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. National Oil & Development Co. v. Keystone Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mercantile Trust Co. v. RolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Rohland v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Reinauer v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API