Legal Opinion
State v. Murphy
Montana Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 2003No. 02-222PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
I. INTRODUCTION
¶1 John E. Murphy (Murphy) appeals the judgment entered by the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, denying his motion to dismiss the charge of failing to keep his registration as a violent offender current.
¶2 We address the following issue on appeal:
¶3 Did the District Court err in denying Murphy’s motion to dismiss, as ex post facto, the charge of failing to keep his registration as a violent offender current?
¶4 Our decision in State v. Mount, 2003 MT 275, 317 Mont. 481, 78 P.3d 829, controls the disposition of this issue and we, therefore, affirm.
II. FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. MountMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Battin v. TaggertSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Smith v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BeanblossomMontana Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RobinsonMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Yorlum Properties, Ltd. v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. CosgroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- State v. DreidleinMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 2003