Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 2000No. 00-121PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

¶1 Ronald Allen Smith appeals from the dismissal of his petition for postconviction relief by the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County. We affirm.

¶2 We restate the issues as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in ruling that Smith is procedurally barred from raising the issue of the constitutionality of Montana’s statutory scheme of selecting substitute judges as applied to his case?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in failing to grant Smith a hearing so he could present evidence that Judge Larson’s post-sentencing actions show bias toward him and his counsel?

Background

¶5…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ronald Allen Smith v. Jack McCormick Warden, Montana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Hagen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. HansonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Heath v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Robinson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. LarsonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Lacey v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Simon v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API