Legal Opinion
Attorney General v. New Mexico Public Regulation Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 2011No. 32,475, 32,480PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} These consolidated appeals are challenges to the Public Regulation Commission’s (PRC) effort to comply with the Efficient Use of Energy Act. NMSA 1978, Sections 62-17-1 to -11 (2005) (amended 2008) (EUEA). The EUEA was amended by the Legislature, requiring the PRC to identify and remove regulatory disincentives to a public utility’s implementation of energy efficiency programs. To comply with this legislative mandate, the PRC issued a Final Order on April 8, 2010, amending its Energy Efficiency Rules contained in 17.7.2 NMAC (03/01/2007). The Attorney General (AG)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Quintana v. SchnedarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Public Service Company of New Mexico v. NEW MEXICO PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- PNM Gas Services v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Attorney General v. PUBLIC REGULATION COM'NNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- N.M. Atty. Gen. v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Janet v. MarshallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Cordova v. KSL-UnionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Massengill v. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.