Legal Opinion
Aiken v. Lustine Chevrolet, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 26, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-1665PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-ORDER
GASCH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motions of both defendants to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for forum non conveniens. Defendant Zapol asks, in the alternative, that service be quashed as to him.
I. The Claim.
Plaintiff Mary L. Aiken is a resident of the District of Columbia. She alleges that defendant Lawrence Zapol, a salesman for defendant Lustine Chevrolet, Inc., falsely and fraudulently represented to her that she could purchase a new car from Lustine Chevrolet with the right to return the car within 10 days of the purchase date…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Milton Margoles, M.D. v. Alida JohnsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Frost v. PEOPLES DRUG STORE, INCORPORATEDDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Lawrence S. Gross and Pauline S. Gross v. Frances C. OwenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Security Bank, N. A. v. TauberDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Pecco Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Helmer, John v. Doletskaya, ElenaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- The Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D. C. v. Heinrich Bauer VerlagCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Carty v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Verlinden B v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.