Legal Opinion
Matter of Discipline of Appert
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 17, 1981No. 48803PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
These proceedings began in November of 1977 with a notice from the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board to the respondents. The notice warned of possible violations of the prohibitions against attorney advertising and solicitation contained in the Code of Professional Responsibility. A hearing was held before the Board on March 31, 1978, and as a result a petition for disciplinary action against the respondents was filed on or about April 7, 1978. On November 17, 1978, another hearing before the Board was held and was followed by a supplementary petition for discipline…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re von WiegenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against N.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- In re Disciplinary Action Against NwaneriSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Spencer v. Honorable Justices of Supreme Ct. of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- McKenna v. Champion International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.