Katz v. Higson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The question presented in this appeal is whether or not there was in effect on August 9th, 1929, a zoning ordinance of the city of Danbury which would have prevented the granting to the appellees of a permit to erect and construct a large building on their premises to be used as a gasoline service station. The charter of the city contains the following provision: “No ordinance shall take effect and be enforced until the same has been published at least twice in some daily newspaper published in said city, nor until ten days after its passage.” Pursuant to the provisions of § 6 of Chapter 242…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hubbard v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
3Cited by7 opinions
- W. H. Barber Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Board of County Com'rs of Sarpy County v. McNallyNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Creston v. Center Milk Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- State v. WallerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Rule v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.