Legal Opinion
Vega v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 2010No. 07-72618PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Juan Soria Vega petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. Soria Vega asserts that although his motion was not filed within 90 days of the BIA’s merits determination, the motion to reopen was filed within 90 days of the denial of his motion to reconsider and was therefore timely. The Attorney General contends that, to be timely, the motion to reopen had to be filed within 90 days of the BIA’s initial merits determination, not within 90 days of the denial of his motion to reconsider. We…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bernardo Ontiveros-Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ocampo v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Roberto Cruz-Mayaho v. Eric HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Sarmiento v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
- Roderick Go v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.