Legal Opinion

Continental Resources, Inc. v. Schmalenberger

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2003No. 20020179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Continental Resources, Inc. (“Continental”), has petitioned for a writ of mandamus or a supervisory writ directing the district court to vacate its order of May 29, 2002, and directing the district court to disqualify Kent Reierson and the law firm of McKennett Stenehjem Reier son Forsberg & Hermanson, P.C. (collectively referred to as “Reierson”), from further representing James H. Bragg, J. Michael Gleason, doing business as Gleason Land Co., and Julie K. McKinley also known as Julie K. King, or providing successor counsel with any information or documents supplied…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Analytica, Incorporated v. Npd Research, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Appeals of Schwartz & Freeman and Pressman and Hartunian ChtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Clinard v. BlackwoodTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cardona v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  4. Paul S. Damron v. Vern Herzog, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Brown v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley State Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. BullisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. JohnstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In Re: Jorge Gordon MenéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2007
  5. In THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST BULLIS v. BullisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API