Stroup v. Rauschelbach
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, P. J.
This is an action in equity brought to abate a high board fence between adjoining lot owners on the ground that it obstructs thé view from plaintiff’s property, and prevents the circulation of air thereto. The petition further alleges that said fence is not ornamental, is not useful, since a fence three or four feet high would answer every purpose, and that it was erected solely for the purpose of injuring plaintiff and was without advantage to defendant, and is a continuing nuisance.
Plaintiff and defendant own and reside upon adjoining lots in the town of Versailles, Missouri. The lots are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Quincy v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Mahan v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Flaherty v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Medford v. LevyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
- Kirkwood v. FineganMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Klaber v. LakenanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- 44 Plaza, Inc. v. Gray-Pac Land Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Welsh v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Green v. SchickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Paul v. CataniNew York Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.