People v. Kings County Development Co.
California Supreme Court
■The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Jones & Weller, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
A demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the court below, and thereupon judgment was given for the defendant. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The prayer of the complaint is that a certificate of purchase and patent issued by the state to Amelia C. Johnson for the lands described, be declared illegal and void, and canceled; that the conveyance of the lands afterward made by Johnson to the defendant be declared void, and that the plaintiff be adjudged to be the owner of the lands, free of any right or claim of defendant thereto, and for such further relief as may seem proper.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hager v. ShindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- City of Oakland v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Gage v. GuntherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. Banning Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Trimming v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.