Legal Opinion

Diehl and Tutt v. Knight

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

delivered the opinion of the Court.(1) The object of1 the bill was to enjoin executions upon two judgments entered in the criminal court at Memphis, it being’ alleged that said judgments were void because complainants were not served with legal process.

The complainants were sureties upon two bail bonds, one for $1000 and the other for $250'. On November 18, 1924, conditional judgments of forfeiture were entered upon said bonds.

Scire facias issued forthwith and a return was made that complainants were not to be found.

Alias scire facias were then issued and were returned on May 9 and 11, 1925,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Black v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. FrankgosTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Baxter v. ErvinTennessee Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Cole v. WarnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Insurance Co. v. WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ONTARIO SEWING MACHINE COMPANY, LTD. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. State v. ShredehCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Johnson v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  4. In Re: Rader Bonding Company, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State of Tennessee v. Sergio Lara, In re: Debo's Bail Bond Company, LLCCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API