Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Ervin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1858PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wright, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court:

We are of opinion tbat tbe Circuit Judge did not err in this case, because we tbink tbe writ issued to Dickson County, against Theodore Baxter, must be regarded as a counterpart of that issued to Robertson, against Robert Baxter and James T. Connel, and being of opinion, as we are, from tbe statement in tbe petition, tbat tbe plaintiff in error was in fact served with process, it was gross neglect in him, not to have appeared at tbe proper time, and make defence to tbe suit. ‘

But if this were not so, and be in fact were not served, tbe sheriff…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Ordon v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Diehl and Tutt v. KnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API