State v. Arnett
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
STUART, Justice.
Defendants were charged by county attorney’s informations with the crime of injuring or tampering with a vehicle in violation of section 321.78, Code of Iowa. On trial to the municipal court judge, defendants were found guilty. They appeal.
I. Defendants contend the evidence does not establish the crime of injuring or tampering with a motor vehicle in violation of section 321.78. In determining this question we must examine this evidence in the light most favorable to the state.
Carl Miksell, 17 years old, was working at the Derby Service Station across the street from the Ron…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. StodolaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- State v. McLartySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. RidingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- State v. SabinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Keefe v. DonnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- In Re the Welfare of W.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002