Brankin v. Phila., Newtown & New York R. R.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
In this action of ejectment, defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff, entered by the court below for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, although no such pleading was legally required and none was filed. An answer was filed, as directed by the Act of June 7,1915, P. L. 887, as amended by the Act of June 12,1919, P. L. 478, which statute also says “that the court may, on rule, enter such judgment on the pleadings, in favor of either party, as it may appear to the court the party is entitled to.” Since the principles applicable to the two proceedings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ash's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Carter v. Ridge Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Biddle v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Ontelaunee Orchards, Inc. v. RothermelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. Central Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Shelley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- O'Keefe v. Altoona City AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.