Legal Opinion

O'Keefe v. Altoona City Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1973No. Appeal, No. 883 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The sole issue which we are called upon to resolve here is whether appellants’ petition for the appoint*399ment of viewers should have been refused by the Court of Common Pleas of Blair County because of the interdiction of the statute of limitations.

On March 29, 1956, by agreement and with the consent of appellants, employees of the city of Altoona (City) entered upon appellants’ land and installed an underground water line and a surface manhole covering.1 The arrangement between the City and appellants called for the City to assess damages and provide for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Ulakovic v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth's Crosstown Expressway AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Rawls v. Central Bucks Joint School Building AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fulmer v. White Oak BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Carmichaels Mining Machine Repair Co. v. Carmiehaels-Cumberland Joint Sewer AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Hoch v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Andrus v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Andrus v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API