Legal Opinion

Caviezel v. Great Neck Public Schools

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 12, 2012No. 11-3431-cvUnpublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs Martina and Andreas Schenk Caviezel sued defendants under federal and state law for denying them a religious exemption from the New York requirement that they have their children vaccinated as a condition of their attendance of public schools. See N.Y. Pub. Health Law § 2164(7), (9). In three carefully reasoned opinions, the district court ruled that (1) the Caviezels were not entitled to preliminary injunctive relief because they failed, at a hearing, to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, i.e., that their opposition to vaccination was based on “genuine…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Phillips ex rel. B.P. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. We the Patriots USA, Inc. v. Conn. Office of Early Childhood Dev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  3. NM v. Hebrew Academy Long BeachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  4. Phillips ex rel. B.P. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  5. Miller v. DicherryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API