Caviezel v. Great Neck Public Schools
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs Martina and Andreas Schenk Caviezel sued defendants under federal and state law for denying them a religious exemption from the New York requirement that they have their children vaccinated as a condition of their attendance of public schools. See N.Y. Pub. Health Law § 2164(7), (9). In three carefully reasoned opinions, the district court ruled that (1) the Caviezels were not entitled to preliminary injunctive relief because they failed, at a hearing, to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, i.e., that their opposition to vaccination was based on “genuine…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Phillips ex rel. B.P. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- We the Patriots USA, Inc. v. Conn. Office of Early Childhood Dev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- NM v. Hebrew Academy Long BeachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Phillips ex rel. B.P. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Miller v. DicherryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.