Legal Opinion
Miller v. Dicherry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 2018No. 2017 CU 1656PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, J.
A mother appeals a trial court judgment that maintained a 50/50 custody arrangement with the child's father, granted the child's father authority to make medical decisions, and ordered the child be vaccinated. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Teal Dicharry1 and Nicholas Miller are the parents of the minor child, H.M. After the parents' relationship ended, Mr. Miller, on August 1, 2014, filed a petition that sought to set custody and support. The parties stipulated to a joint custody arrangement, which designated Ms. Dicharry as the domiciliary parent and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Evans v. LungrinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Robert Perry Dehart v. Martin Horn, Commissioner of Corrections James S. Price, Supeintendent of Sci Greene United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Bergeron v. BergeronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Weathersby v. HogsettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nicholas Miller v. Teal DicherryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020