Jasper v. Wells
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
The allegations of negligence and proximate cause having been admitted, as well as the ownership of the car by the defendant Wells, the plaintiff offered evidence only upon the issue of damages and then rested his case in chief without offering any testimony whatever on the issue of agency. The admission that the car was owned by Wells established a prima facie ease of agency under the decisions of this court, to which reference will later be made. Accordingly, the defendant went forward with the evidence and expressly denied that Dake was acting as his agent or was authorized to take the car…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Bunnell v. PareliusOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Kantola v. Lovell Auto Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Lehl v. HullOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Brown v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Smith v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Palmer v. Van Petten Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Hopfer v. StaudtOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Buck Witt v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.