Legal Opinion

Lollar v. Jones

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1934No. 6 Div. 583PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action by appellants against ap-pellee for damages for the breach of a warranty in'the sale of soy bean seed for planting.

Counts 5 and 7 allege an express warranty. Counts 6 and 8 allege facts from which it is claimed a warranty was implied by law. We are not concerned with the sufficiency of those counts. The court held them good. To them defendant pleaded 1, 2, and 3. The court sustained demurrer to plea No. 2. No. 3 is the general issue. Demurrer to plea 1 was overruled. In this appellants insist the court erred.

We entertain the view that in this respect there…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Winter-Loeb Grocery Co. v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Grafton-Stamps Drug Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Davis v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Charles Townsend Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Bradford v. Moore Brothers Feed and GrocerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Ryan v. Charles Townsend Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Sparks v. Total Body Essential Nutrition, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Sparks v. Total Body Essential Nutrition, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API