Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sparks v. Total Body Essential Nutrition, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 17, 2009No. 1071708Published

1DissentBolin, Justice

Because I believe that the enactment of Alabama’s Uniform Commercial Code (“the UCC”) did not abrogate the sealed-container defense, I must respectfully dissent from the main opinion.

Section 7-2-314, Ala.Code 1975, provides:

“(1) Unless excluded or modified (Section 7-2-316), a warranty that the goods shall be merchantable is implied in a contract for their sale if the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind. Under this section the serving for value of food or drink to be consumed either on the premises or elsewhere is a sale.
“(2) Goods to be merchantable must be at least such…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Zabner v. Howard Johnson's, IncorporatedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Birmingham Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Ex Parte Morrison's Cafeteria of Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API