Legal Opinion

Jones v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Lenawee. Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

Tbe following short but clear statement of tbe facts in tbis case, and of tbe plaintiff’s declaration, is taken from tbe brief of counsel for tbe defendant.

On tbe twelfth day of April, 1881, tbe plaintiff was seriously injured, in coupling cars, at Monroe, in tbis State, and this action is brought to recover for such injury. He entered into the employ of tbe defendant about tbe twenty-fourth day of June, 1880, as brakeman, and was employed as such upon a passenger train exclusively, until *575the early part of February, 1881. His run was from Adrian to Jackson and return, and from Adrian to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leary v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Fitter v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Lindemann v. RuskWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Cole v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Gavigan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API