Berger v. Cornwell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
Defendants Cornwell owed plaintiff, an invitee, the legal duty to maintain their parking area in such condition as a reasonably careful and prudent proprietor would deem sufficient to protect patrons from danger while exercising ordinary care for their own safety. Sledge v. Wagoner, 250 N.C. 559, 109 S.E. 2d 180.
All the evidence tends to show that the place where Soesbee parked the taxi was shaded by a pine tree hedge and was lower than other portions of the parking area. There was evidence tending to show that, in the shaded area where Soesbee parked, there were icy spots…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sledge v. WagonerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hinson v. Cato's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Hedrick Ex Rel. Hedrick v. TigniereSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Game v. CHARLES STORES CO. INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Clary v. Alexander County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973