Legal Opinion

Clark v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1924No. 18559PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent, an employee of the Diamond Match Company, while engaged in extra-hazardous work in its factory, was injured. Her work consisted of sorting blocks conveyed from saws. The blocks measured two inches by two and three-eighths inches, and from six to twenty inches in length. While so engaged, at about ten o’clock in the morning on June 7, 1923, one of the blocks was thrown from a saw and struck respondent on the right side of the abdomen. Almost immediately she complained of severe pain, and suffered from nausea. The following morning her doctor determined that she was suffering *257from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shadbolt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Marney v. Industrial Insurance DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Tomovich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frandila v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Richards v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Precision Connecting Rod Service v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Watkins v. Brunswick Restaurant Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Christensen v. GrantWyoming Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API