Legal Opinion

Shadbolt v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1922No. 17253PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This cause arose out of a claim filed with, and later rejected by, the department of labor and industries. After the rejection, the claimant appealed to the superior court, and trial there resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining the claimant’s right to compensation. From this judgment, the department of labor and industries appeals.

Alonzo Shadbolt, the claimant and respondent, was employed about May 1, 1921, as a shingle sawyer at a shingle mill in the city of Olympia. On May 11 he went *410to work as usual at about 5:30 p. m. (he being employed on the night…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Original Gas Engine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Poccardi v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Zappala v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McPhee's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Hurley v. Selden-Breck Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cole v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Pace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Frandila v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Great American Indemnity Company v. FriddellTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McKinnie v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API