Legal Opinion
D.M.G. v. K.M.L.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 3, 2008No. 36564-2-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 D.M.G.1 appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his parentage petition as untimely under RCW 26.26.540(2). We agree with the trial court that, under RCW 26.26.540(2), D.M.G.’s parentage petition, which was filed less than two months after the results of a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) test showed him to be the father but more than two years after the child’s mother acknowledged another man as Q.A.L.’s father, was not filed within the statutory time limits. But because the trial court’s order dismissing D.M.G.’s parentage petition was issued in a proceeding in which the child’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Olympic Forest Products, Inc. v. Chaussee Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. SantosWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. DoutyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Miller v. SyboutsWashington Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Marriage of AkonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- D.E. v. K.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- In re the Parentage of S.E.C. V.A.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In Re The Parentage Of V.lc-p. Chad Clark v. Elizabeth PageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Phil Larson, V. Jarritos Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021