Legal Opinion

Stickney v. Tullis-Vermillion

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2006No. 2004 CA 83PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolff, Judge.

{¶ 1} Cynthia A. Tullis-Vermillion and Melanie J. Tullís appeal from a judgment of the Clark County Court of Common Pleas, which granted the request of David and Brenda Stíckney for specific performance of the options contained in the trusts of Patricia and Nathan Tullís and ordered the trustees of the trusts to sell all of the farm property, known as the Tullís Farm, to the Stickneys at the appraised value of $1,046,500.

{¶ 2} The following facts are undisputed.

{¶ 3} Brenda Stickney, Cynthia Tullis-Vermillion, Karen Tullís, Melanie Tullís, and Nancy Thickel are the five daughters…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Delfino v. Paul Davies Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. North Coast Cookies, Inc. v. Sweet Temptations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Domo v. McCarthyOhio Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bouton v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  2. Thies v. WheelockOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Maguire v. National City Bank, 22168 (8-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Canter v. GarvinOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Clements v. Mayhew, 2006 Ca 126 (7-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API