Legal Opinion
Kinetics, Inc. v. El Paso Products Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 19, 1982No. 5559PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
The plaintiff, Kinetics, appeals the directed verdict granted against it. We affirm.
The issues for our decision are: 1. the authority of the trial court to order a directed verdict when the order was made subsequent to a jury deadlock and subsequent to twice denying such a motion; 2. the propriety of the directed verdict. FACTS
Kinetics, plaintiff, seeks money damages from El Paso Products, defendant, for supplying defective resins. Kinetics used the resins to manufacture filament-wound polyester pipe. Kinetics alleged in their amended complaint that El Paso Products was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Craven v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Skyhook Corp. v. JasperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Hill v. W. E. Brittain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Gallegos v. Citizens Insurance AgencyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Reed v. State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Saranillio v. SilvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Garcia v. CoffmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.