Legal Opinion

PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 26, 2005No. 05-04-01047-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice FITZGERALD.

PAJ, Inc. d/b/a Prime Art & Jewel brought suit against The Hanover Insurance Company, seeking a declaration concerning Hanover’s contractual obligation to defend or indemnify PAJ in copyright infringement litigation. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment below concerning the interpretation of their contract for insurance. The trial court granted Hanover’s motion and denied PAJ’s motion. PAJ challenges those rulings in five issues in this Court. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court’s order,

The Summary Judgment Proceedings

T…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lubbock County v. Trammel's Bail BondsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. George E. Gibbons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hernandez v. Gulf Group LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Country Mutual Ins. Co. v. Livorsi MarineIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Coastal Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  5. Motiva Enterprises, LLC v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API