State v. Mountain Spring Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of' the superior court for Pacific-county, Frater., J., entered December 24, 1908, upon findings-in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the-court without a jury, in an action for a mandate to compel a. water company to furnish water to the inhabitants of a city..
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for final writ of mandate, entered by the superior court of Pacific county. The action’was first brought in the name of the city as plaintiff, but by later stipulation the state was made plaintiff. Stated as briefly as possible, the amended complaint sets forth the granting of a franchise for constructing and operating water works in the city of South Bend, to the appellant — or rather to the South Bend Water Company, to whose rights the appellant succeeded; and it was authorized to build, operate, and maintain water works in the city under such provisions as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Winfield v. Winfield Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Winfield Water Co. v. City of WinfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Henry v. LindWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. HeroldWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- McGregor v. HurstSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.