Loren Bagola v. Thomas R. Kindt, Warden, P.W. Keohane, Warden, Terah Tracy, Factory Manager
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Loren Bagóla, a prisoner, appeals the district court’s dismissal for frivolousness of his Bivens action 1 against prison officials concerning his conditions of confinement. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The lower court dismissed his in forma pauperis complaint on the grounds that the subjective element of “deliberate indifference” was “entirely absent.” (Rec. at 4.) However, Bagóla expressly states in his cause of action that the officials violated his Eighth Amendment rights “due to defendants’ deliberate indifference to the serious need for Safety precautions” for certain machines. (Compl. at 6…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dennis W. Christopher v. Edward BussCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Loren Bagola v. Thomas KindtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Grimsley v. MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Kelly Rhodes v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Vaccaro v. DobreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.