Davis v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
This appeal revolves around a portion of the instructions given to the jury by the Criminal Court of Baltimore in the trial of Lorenzo Davis, Jr. thirteen years ago. The court advised the jury:
If the jury considering all the evidence, inculpatory and exculpatory, entertain a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s participation in the crime, they should acquit him. Thus a defendant is entitled to acquittal if the alibi testimony, taken into consideration with all the other evidence in the case, raises a reasonable doubt of guilt. But, in order to prove an alibi conclusively, the testimony must…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Robeson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Colvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.