Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. McLaughlin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 2000No. B125410PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*329Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

Janet McLaughlin appeals from the trial court’s entry of a judgment of marital dissolution ending her marriage to respondent Donald T. McLaughlin. Appellant contends judgment should not have been entered in the absence of statutorily required declarations of disclosure regarding the parties’ assets and liabilities. However, appellant has failed to show prejudicial error and, therefore, we shall affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Donald and Janet were married in November 1980, and separated in January 1997.1 They had one child, bom in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Waller v. TJD, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Santina v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Holmes v. Petrovich Development Co. LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Kington v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Newstart Real Estate Inv. LLC v. Huang, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Ruiz v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API