Legal Opinion

Santina v. General Petroleum Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1940No. Civ. 11428PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment on the verdict for damages for personal injuries arising out of defendants’ negligence. The appeal from the judgment is confined to the asserted irregularity of the proceedings in the jury room, hence, no statement of facts or of the issues involved in the trial is necessary.

The jury retired after complete instructions with two forms of verdict which were given them by the clerk. One form was to be used if the jury found for the plaintiff, the other to be used if the finding was for the defendants. After some deliberation the foreman called the bailiff and asked…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Hill v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Wiley v. EasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API