Legal Opinion

Suquamish Indian Tribe v. Kitsap County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 19, 1998No. 40540-3-I, 40545-4-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

The North Kitsap Coordinating Council (NKCC), a citizens’ group, some individual members of the group, and the Suquamish Indian Tribe commenced this action by filing land use petitions challenging Kitsap . County’s approval of a proposal to develop an area near the Tribe’s reservation. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the county and the developers based on a determination that the petitioning parties lacked standing. On appeal, the petitioners argue that the trial court erred by concluding that they did not have standing under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) to challenge…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Save a Valuable Environment v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Knight v. City of YelmWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Quality Rock Products, Inc. v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Quality Rock Products, Inc. v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API