Legal Opinion
Fry v. McCall
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1996No. 95 Civ. 1915 (JGK)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge:
In her Second Amended Complaint, the plaintiff, Patricia Fry, alleges that the defendants deprived her of her constitutional rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Section 1983 provides a cause of action against any person who, under color of state law, deprives another of their federal rights, privileges or immunities. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Fry alleges violations of her rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, together with state law claims for defamation, breach of contract and violations of the New York…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Soloviev v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Chinn v. City University of New York School of Law at Queens CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Bennett v. City of HolyokeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Longo v. SUFFOLK CTY. POLICE DEPT. CTY. OF SUFFOLKDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Smith v. AVSC International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.