Legal Opinion
Smith v. AVSC International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 26, 2001No. 00 Civ. 9832(RWS)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
In lieu of answering the complaint (the “First Complaint”), defendants AVSC International, Inc. (“AVSC”), Dr. Amy Pollack (“Pollack”), Thomas Gray (“Gray”), and Jeanne Haws (“Haws”) have moved to dismiss the claims against them pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) as follows: (1) all claims against Pollack; (3) the Third Cause of Action against Gray; (4) the First, Second and Fourth Causes of Action against Haws; (5) the Fifth Cause of Action in its entirety; and pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. Rule 12(e) and (f), (6) to strike certain matters as scandalous or irrelevant…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Oram v. SoulCycle LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Krasner v. HSH NORDBANK AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Illiano v. Mineola Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Lynch v. Southampton Animal Shelter Foundation Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.