Blondel v. Le Vesconte
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Dakota county, Crosby, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after a verdict of $147.48 for plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The plaintiffs claimed to recover an unpaid balance for services alleged to have been rendered to the defendant from the 1st of August, 1886, to the 10th of July, 1887, upon an oral agreement fixing no definite period of service, but designating the compensation to be $25 a month. The defendant denies the rendering of any service, except under a contract in writing providing that the service should be for a year, to commence September 3, 1886, and terminate September 2, 1887, for the entire compensation of $300. The further defence is that the plaintiffs, on July 11,1887, without justifiable…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Spence & Howe Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Cable v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Dayton Co. v. Carpet, Linoleum & Resilient Floor Decorators' UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949