Legal Opinion
Excess Ins. v. Brillhart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1941No. 2223PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas dismissing appellant’s petition for a declaratory judgment. 28 U.S.C.A. § 400. The sole question presented for consideration is the right of the Excess Insurance Company oh America, appellant herein, to maintain an action for a declaratory judgment seeking to determine its liability to appellees under a reinsurance agreement contract executed by it with the Central Mutual Insurance Company of Chicago, Illinois, herein referred to as Central.
Appellant and Central were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Consumers Finance Service, Inc. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Boyle Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Garrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Ohio Casualty Co. v. Jackson County BankDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. HanleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.