Legal Opinion
FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. Hanley
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 27, 1956No. Civ. A. 2706PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STARR, Chief Judge.
The defendants’ motion to dismiss this present action, No. 2706, must be considered in connection with a prior pending action, No. 2596, between the same parties.
On December 29, 1954, the defendants herein, Joseph A. Hanley and Ruth C. Hanley, his wife, as plaintiffs began suit in the circuit court of Berrien county, Michigan, against the Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, plaintiff in the present action. The Fireman’s company as defendant removed that action, ■No. 2596, to this court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. In that action the Hanleys alleged that on March…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
- Sotomura v. County of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1975
- Hanley v. Westchester Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1959
- Houts v. Universal City Studios, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1984
- Edwards v. MadiganDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.