United States v. Calabrese

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZAGEL, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant James Marcello (“Defendant” or “Mr. Marcello”) moves to suppress certain intercepted conversations and all evidence derived therefrom. He argues that the Government failed to comply with the sealing requirements contained in Title III of the Omnibus' Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (“Title III”), as amended, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq., and that the recordings should therefore be suppressed. 1 The potential evidence in question was all intercepted while Mr. Marcello was incarcerated at FCI Milan, Michigan. The…