Legal Opinion

Gage v. McSweeney

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 21, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal in Chancery in foreclosure proceedings. Heard on the report of a special master at the March Term, 1902, Washington County, Stand, Chancellor, presiding. Decree for the petitioner. The defendant appealed. When a note is made at a certain place and the payee resides out of the state, the place of making the note or the residence of the maker, is the place of payment. Peck v. Hibbard, 26 Vt.698; Worden v. Nourse, 36 Vt.756; McCurden v. Jonas, 173 Pa.

Read the full summary

Appeal in Chancery in foreclosure proceedings. Heard on the report of a special master at the March Term, 1902, Washington County, Stand, Chancellor, presiding. Decree for the petitioner. The defendant appealed. When a note is made at a certain place and the payee resides out of the state, the place of making the note or the residence of the maker, is the place of payment. Peck v. Hibbard, 26 Vt.698; Worden v. Nourse, 36 Vt.756; McCurden v. Jonas, 173 Pa. St. 507; Sasseer v. Whitley & Stone, 10 Md. 103; Pickets v. Pendleton, 14 Md. 320 ¡Orcutt v. Hough, 54 N. H. 472; Bullard v. Thomas, 35…

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

At the time of giving the note in question, the maker resided at Barre, in this state, and the payee, in the *372state of New Jersey. Since that time, the maker’s residence has remained the same. The payee’s residence remained the same until about three years ago, when she removed to Philadelphia, in the state of Pennsylvania, where she has since resided. The debt was contracted at Barre, and the note was there executed and delivered. It is dated at Barre, but it has no specified place of payment. Where was the place of payment in law, is one of the questions before us.

Since the residence of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buckner v. Finley & Van LearSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Hale v. . PattonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Allshouse v. RamsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  4. Gill v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  5. Peck v. HibbardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hobbs v. LudlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API