Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Rome

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 10, 1998No. 96-1215; Crim.App. No. 9500934PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of attempted robbery in violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 880. The adjudged and approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 2 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence without opinion. Our Court specified the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN DENYING DEFENSE…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. SmartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. DaultonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. WiesenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. United States v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  5. United States v. StrandCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API