Sprague Specialties Co. v. Mershon
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from rested solely on the decree in the New York case, Mershon v. O’Neill (D. C.) 3 F. Supp. 26. As that decree has now been reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, there is nothing on which the decree before us can stand. In this situation the proper course is for us to reverse the decree appealed from and remand the case for further proceedings. Butler v. Eaton, 141 U. S. 240, 11 S. Ct. 985, 35 L. Ed. 713; Ransom v. City of Pierre (C. C. A.) 101 F. 665, 670; Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Richmond Guano Co. (C. C. A.) 297 F. 580. See Deposit Bank v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Butler v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Richmond Guano Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
- Ransom v. City of PierreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Mershon v. O'NeillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Illinois Cent. R. Co., Inc. v. OlberdingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954