Legal Opinion
State v. Stanfield
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 2014No. 2013-KA-1193PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWIN A. LOMBARD, Judge.
_jjThe Appellant, defendant Ronald Stan-field, seeks a review of the record for errors patent and reversal of his adjudication as a multiple offender and sentence of eight years at hard labor. For the reasons that follow, we affirm his adjudication and sentence. Furthermore, we grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The defendant was convicted of simple burglary, a violation of La.Rev.Stat. 14:62 and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor, with credit for time served. Stan-field later filed a motion for post-verdict judgment of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BrazellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. RossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. McGillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.