Legal Opinion
Mayberry v. Lenyo
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 13, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00903Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION TIMOTHY MARCUS MAYBERRY, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:21-CV-903-JD-MGG MARK S. LENYO, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Timothy Marcus Mayberry, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint under this court’s diversity jurisdiction, alleging the attorney he hired to represent him during his state murder trial committed legal malpractice. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Meridian Security Insurance Co. v. David L. SadowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Hart v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.