Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Hedlund Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 2000No. 1-99-1280PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff Kate Armstrong appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing her complaint for unpaid commissions against defendants Hedlund Corporation and David Hedlund, with prejudice, based on the running of the five-year statute of limitations for oral contracts pursuant to section 2 — 619 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619 (West 1998)). On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in finding that her cause of action accrued on the last day of her employment, October 18, 1993, as opposed to her next regularly scheduled payday, on October 31,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ragan v. Columbia Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Andrews v. FoxworthyIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. McMahan v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Barber-Colman Co. v. A & K Midwest Insulation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. McNamee v. Federated Equipment & Supply Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Apex Digital, Incorporated v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Paciga v. Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Watts v. ADDO Management, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  4. Pace v. Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Majmudar v. House of Spices (India), Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API